Now that Dan Patrick, a well known conservative talk show host, who has portrayed himself as a rabid conservative, has been elected as Lt. Governor of Texas, he is proving to be not a constitutional conservative, but more of a controlling fascist, when it comes to backing and supporting and lobbying for legislation that would allow citizens of Texas to carry a concealed weapon based on the literal meaning of the Second Amendment, “constitutional carry.”
With this attitude, it is evident that Mr. Patrick doesn’t understand the basic principles of freedom, so ingrained in the heart of native Texans, especially West Texans.
Dan Patrick Opposes Constitutional Carry in Texas
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said Monday he was uncertain whether support exists in the Legislature for so-called “constitutional carry,” which would give all Texans the right to openly carry a firearm — with or without a permit.
In a radio interview, Patrick noted that last session lawmakers passed legislation allowing the open carry of handguns, a proposal whose support he had also questioned at the start of the session.
“On constitutional carry, I’ll say the same thing: I don’t know if the votes are there,” Patrick told San Antonio host Trey Ware.
Patrick did express some wariness about constitutional carry, citing law enforcement concerns. Patrick has made championing police a priority, especially after a shooting last year in Dallas that killed five officers and wounded seven others.
Let’s deal with the second issue first. I would lay good money down that Dan Patrick has been listening to communist Art Acevedo, who is leaving Austin and going to Houston, who opposed open carry, and who enabled the federal government to come into his county and take forced blood draws during random traffic stops in violation of the constitution.
Or he has been talking to someone equally as communist as Art. So the strategy he has chosen is a common one and is designed to protect his boys in the Texas Senate and House from exposure.
He simply says that he doesn’t know if there are enough votes. That way, it gets killed in committee and the anti-gun politicians never out themselves with a formal vote on a bill.
I hate the idea of committees anyway because they are a good way to formulate compromise legislation that ends up bilking people for money, sending that money to constituents and then ultimately doing no good with meaningless legislation.